The Effect Of Bottom Gill Net Mesh Size In The Namar Village Waters Southeast Maluku Regency

Authors

  • Yuliana Anastasia Ngamel Program Studi Manajemen Rekayasa Perikanan Tangkap, Politeknik Perikanan Negeri Tual, Jalan Raya Langgur-Sathean, KM.06 Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara, 97611, Maluku, Indonesia
  • Julianus Notanubun Program Studi Manajemen Rekayasa Perikanan Tangkap, Politeknik Perikanan Negeri Tual, Jalan Raya Langgur-Sathean, KM.06 Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara, 97611, Maluku, Indonesia
  • Imanuel Musa Thenu Program Studi Manajemen Rekayasa Perikanan Tangkap, Politeknik Perikanan Negeri Tual, Jalan Raya Langgur-Sathean, KM.06 Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara, 97611, Maluku, Indonesia
  • Benediktus Jeujanan Program Studi Manajemen Rekayasa Perikanan Tangkap, Politeknik Perikanan Negeri Tual, Jalan Raya Langgur-Sathean, KM.06 Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara, 97611, Maluku, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46252/jsai-fpik-unipa.2023.Vol.7.No.3.306

Keywords:

bottom gill net, mesh size, Southeast Maluku

Statistic:

Abstract views: 124 , PDF downloads: 156

Abstract

Fish resources Utilization in Southeast Maluku waters uses fishing gear, one of them is the bottom gill net. This study aims to determine the composition of fish species caught with different bottom gill net mesh sizes and the effective mesh size. The method used in this study was an experimental method of fishing with different mesh sizes, namely 2.5 inches and 3 inches, as well as data analysis using the paired sample t test. There were five types of catch obtained at a mesh size of 2.5 inches, namely Bubara fish (Carangoides bajad) totaling 54 individuals (22.41%), Cockatoos (Skarus dimidiatus) 46 individuals (18.67%), Samandar (Siganus canaliculatus 35 individuals (14.52%), Sikuda (Lethrinus atkinsoni) 39 individuals (12.45%) and Jackfruit seeds (Parupeneus indikus) totaling 24 individuals (9.96%).The mesh size of 3 inches obtained the type of Cockatoo fish (Skarus dimidiatus) totaled 27 individuals (30.58%), Jackfruit seeds (Parupeneus indikus) 14 individuals (15.91%), Bubara (Carangoides bajad) 13 individuals (14.77%), Samandar (Siganus canaliculatus) 11 individuals (12 .50 %) and sand (Pentapodus nagascokiensis) 6 (6.62 %). The total weight of the catch in basic gill nets with different mesh sizes, namely a 2.5-inch mesh size, obtained a total catch weight of 49,731.44 grams with an average catch per operation of 4,521.04 grams, while for mezh size 3 inches of 21,615.51 grams with an average per operation of 1,965.05 grams. Based on the paired sample t-test, it showed a significant difference in the use of different mesh sizes on the total weight of the catch, where the total weight of the catches obtained in the 2.5-inch treatment was more than in the 3-inch treatment, which means that hypothesis H1 is accepted Hₒ rejected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggrayni, F.D, & Zainu, M. (2022). Pengaruh Perbedaan Ukuran Mata Jaring (Mesh Size) Terhadap Hasil Tangkapan Pada Jaring Insang (Gill Net) di Perairan Desa Sedayulawas, Kabupaten Lamongan, Jurnal Juvenil, 3(3).

Fachrussyah, Z. C., & Baruadi, A. S. R. (2022). Influence of Technical and Operational Aspects of Nike Fishing Using Tagahu in Gorontalo City. Jurnal Sumberdaya Akuatik Indopasifik, 6(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.46252/jsai-fpik-unipa.2022.Vol.6.No.1.192

Martasuganda, S. (2002). Teknologi Penangkapan Jaring Insang. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.

Muhidin. S, & Wulandari, R. (2021). Pengaruh perbedaan ukuran mata jaring dan waktu tangkap terhadap hasil tangkapan bottom gill net di Perairan Liang, Maluku Tengah. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Perikanan Tangk 6(1), 1-10

Nazir, M. (2003). Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta

Notanubun, J., Ngamel , Y. A., & Bukutubun, S. (2022). The Diversity of The Kinds Caught and The Synchronization of Surface Gill Net Catching Time in The Waters of Ohoi Tuburngil Southeast Maluku Regency. Jurnal Sumberdaya Akuatik Indopasifik, 6(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.46252/jsai-fpik-unipa.2022.Vol.6.No.2.230

Pala, M & Yuksel, M. (2010). Comparison of the catching Efficiency of Monofilamen Gillnet with Different Mesh Size. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 7: 1146–1149.

Pondaag, M.F., Sompie, M.S., & Budiman, J. (2018). Komposisi hasil tangkapan jaring insang dasar dan cara tertangkapnya ikan di Perairan Malalayang. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Perikanan Tangkap, 3(2): 62-67

Pratama R. (2012). Pengaruh Perbedaan Ukuran Mata Jaring Rampus Terhadap Hasil Tangkapan Ikan Layang (Decapterus kurroides) di Perairan Cisolok, Palabuhan Ratu, Kabupaten Sukabumi [Skripsi]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor

Prasetyo, G. D., Yunanto, M. A., Dimu, R. T. S. ., & Sugiono, S. (2022). Distribution Catch of Pelagic Fish by Purse Seine Fisheries Based on Marine Environmental Parameters in Pati District. Jurnal Sumberdaya Akuatik Indopasifik, 6(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.46252/jsai-fpik-unipa.2022.Vol.6.No.1.216

Rahantan, A., & Puspito, G. (2012). Ukuran Mata dan Shortening yang Sesuai untuk Jaring Insang yang Dioperasikan di Perairan Tual. Marine Fisheries: Journal of Marine Fisheries Technology and Management, 3(2), 141–147.

Rahayu, M., Rizal, M., Hafinuddin, H., Bahri, S., Khairi, I., Fuadi, A., Zakaria, M., & Sarong, M. A. (2023). Analysis of The Catch Diversity Index at Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) Based on Local Resources in The Waters of Kuala Daya, Aceh Jaya Regency. Jurnal Sumberdaya Akuatik Indopasifik, 7(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.46252/jsai-fpik-unipa.2023.Vol.7.No.2.303

Ruslan, H.S., Tawari. (2013) Efisiensi Jaring Insang Permukaan Terhadap Hasil Tangkapan Ikan Layang (Decapterus macarelus) Di Teluk Kayeli,, Jurnal “Amanisal” PSP FPIK Unpatti-Ambon, 2(2): 32– 39.

Saputra, D. N., Gede Astawa Karang, I. W., & Ria Puspitha, N. L. P. (2021). Pengaruh Perbedaan Ukuran Jaring Insang Terhadap Hasil Tangkapan Ikan Tongkol Euthynnus Sp. Di Perairan Tenggara Kabupaten Karangasem. Journal of Marine Research and Technology, 4(2).

Surbakti, J.A. & Wehelmina, S.R. (2021). Analisis Komposisi Hasil Tangkapan Bagan Perahu dan Tancap di Perairan Teluk Kupang. Journal of Marine Research, 10(1):117-122.

Sumardi, Z., Sarong, M.A., & Nasir, M. (2014). Alat Penangkap Ikan yang Ramah Lingkungan Berbasis Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries di Kota Banda Aceh. Agrisep. 15(2): 10- 18

Sugiyono. (2014). Statistika untuk Penelitian. CV Alfabeta, Bandung.

Supranto, J. (2003). Metode Penelitian Hukum Statistik. PT. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta

Syamsuddin, M., & Wulandari, R. (2021). Pengaruh perbedaan ukuran mata jaring dan waktu tangkap terhadap hasil tangkapan bottom gill net di Perairan Liang, Maluku Tengah. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Perikanan Tangkap, 6(1), 1-10.

Saputra, R. M. (2012). Teknologi Penangkapan Jaring Insang. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.

White, W.T., Last, P.R., Stevens, J.D., Yearsley, G.K., Fahmi & Dharmadi, (2006). Economically Important Sharks and Rays of Indonesia (Hiu dan Pari yang Bernilai Ekonomis Penting di Indonesia). ACIAR Monograph Series; No. 124. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. Canberra.

Published

2023-06-11

How to Cite

Ngamel, Y. A., Notanubun, J., Thenu, I. M., & Jeujanan, B. (2023). The Effect Of Bottom Gill Net Mesh Size In The Namar Village Waters Southeast Maluku Regency. Jurnal Sumberdaya Akuatik Indopasifik, 7(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.46252/jsai-fpik-unipa.2023.Vol.7.No.3.306

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 124 , PDF downloads: 156